Journal Article Evaluation Form Template
Streamline Your Article Review Process with This Template
Evaluating journal articles can be a challenging and time-consuming task. This Journal Article Evaluation Form Template helps researchers and educators systematically assess the quality and content of scholarly articles for their reviews. With clear criteria for analysis, you can ensure thorough evaluations, foster constructive feedback, and improve your overall review process, all while saving time and energy. Plus, this template adheres to best practices for accessibility, making it easy for everyone to use. Try the live template today!
When to use this form
Use this form when you need a consistent way to review a scholarly article for class, journal club, or a team decision. It helps you compare studies, spot bias, and judge whether findings are trustworthy and relevant to your question. In courses, it standardizes student reviews and speeds grading. If you supervise trainees, pair it with the Intern evaluation form to document growth in literature appraisal. Mentors can align criteria with the Mentor evaluation form to guide feedback and discussion. During annual reviews, summarize key appraisals and reference them alongside your Performance appraisal form to show impact on practice or policy.
Must Ask Journal Article Evaluation Questions
- What is the article's main research question or objective?
Stating the purpose keeps your review focused and fair. It lets you judge relevance and see how well the study answers the question you care about.
- Is the study design appropriate for the question and clearly described?
Design fit affects validity and your risk of bias. Clear methods also make the work reproducible and easier for you to compare across studies.
- How credible are the methods, data, and analyses (for example, sample size, controls, statistics)?
Assessing evidence strength helps you avoid overvaluing weak or underpowered studies. It also supports transparent scoring across the articles you review.
- Do the results support the authors' conclusions, and what biases or limitations are disclosed or overlooked?
This check prevents you from overclaiming and surfaces threats to validity. It informs how much confidence you can place in the findings and their generalizability.
- How will you use this article in your work, and what actions or follow-ups will you take?
A concrete plan turns review into action, such as citing the study, updating a protocol, or seeking stronger evidence. For reflection, you can log takeaways in the Individual self-assessment form.
More Forms
- 100% Free - No Catches
- Collect Responses Today
- Tailor to your Look & Feel