Agile Maturity Assessment Form Template
Evaluate Your Agile Practices and Drive Improvement
Many organizations struggle to understand their Agile maturity level, which can hinder effective transformation. This Agile Maturity Assessment Form Template helps you identify key areas for improvement and gain insights into your Agile practices. Use it to evaluate team workflows, improve project delivery, and streamline communication, ensuring your organization can adapt and thrive in a dynamic environment. Plus, the form features WCAG-aligned labels for inclusivity. Explore the live template to get started.
When to use this form
Use this assessment when your team wants a clear view of how it works and where to improve. Run it before a new release train, after a rocky quarter, or ahead of a big reorg. Scrum masters, product owners, and engineering leaders will spot gaps in flow, feedback, and planning. Team members can reflect on their own habits using the Self assessment survey form, while peers add balance with the Peer evaluation form. Managers can track coaching follow-ups with the Employee supervision form. The outcome is a short list of focused changes, such as tightening WIP limits, improving backlog clarity, or involving stakeholders earlier, so you ship value more often with less stress.
Must Ask Agile Maturity Assessment Questions
- How often do you deliver working, tested increments to users, and what is your average cycle time?
Delivery frequency reveals real agility; cycle time exposes wait states and bottlenecks. Tracking both helps you plan realistic commitments and focus improvements where they cut delay.
- Who owns backlog prioritization, and how visible and up to date is the backlog to the team and stakeholders?
Clear ownership and transparency drive alignment and reduce churn. You can also compare team behavior with the Employee peer review form to see if collaboration supports that ownership.
- Which ceremonies do you run consistently (planning, daily scrum, review, retrospective), and what tangible outputs come from each?
Consistency matters less than outcomes; artifacts like sprint goals, demo notes, and improvement actions show value. This clarifies whether meetings enable decisions or just consume time.
- How do you measure and limit work in progress, and which flow metrics do you review each sprint?
Limiting WIP and reviewing cycle time, throughput, and aging exposes overload and improves predictability. Teams that see these trends earlier can adjust scope before quality or morale slip.
- How safe is it to raise impediments and run experiments, and how are improvement actions tracked and owned?
Psychological safety fuels learning; without it, issues hide and delays grow. Assigning an owner and due date for each action creates follow-through and makes progress visible.
More Forms
- 100% Free - No Catches
- Collect Responses Today
- Tailor to your Look & Feel